50 U.S. Code § 3341 - Security clearances

the 15-year period beginning on the date the security clearance was granted in the case of a Confidential Clearance.

The term “personnel security investigation” means any investigation required for the purpose of determining the eligibility of any military, civilian, or government contractor personnel to access classified information.

(7) The term “periodic reinvestigations” means investigations conducted for the purpose of updating a previously completed background investigation—

every 5 years in the case of a top secret clearance or access to a highly sensitive program; every 10 years in the case of a secret clearance; or every 15 years in the case of a Confidential Clearance. (8) The term “appropriate committees of Congress ” means—

the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committees on Armed Services, Homeland Security, Government Reform, and the Judiciary of the House of Representatives ; and

the Select Committee on Intelligence and the Committees on Armed Services, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Judiciary of the Senate .

(9) Access determination.— The term “access determination” means the determination regarding whether an employee—

is eligible for access to classified information in accordance with Executive Order 12968 (60 Fed. Reg. 40245; relating to access to classified information), or any successor thereto, and Executive Order 10865 (25 Fed. Reg. 1583; relating to safeguarding classified information with [2] industry), or any successor thereto; and

possesses a need to know under such an Order.

(b) Selection of entity Except as otherwise provided, not later than 90 days after December 17, 2004 , the President shall select a single department, agency, or element of the executive branch to be responsible for—

directing day-to-day oversight of investigations and adjudications for personnel security clearances, including for highly sensitive programs, throughout the United States Government;

developing and implementing uniform and consistent policies and procedures to ensure the effective, efficient, and timely completion of security clearances and determinations for access to highly sensitive programs, including the standardization of security questionnaires, financial disclosure requirements for security clearance applicants, and polygraph policies and procedures;

ensuring reciprocal recognition of access to classified information among the agencies of the United States Government, including acting as the final authority to arbitrate and resolve disputes involving the highly sensitive programs pursuant to subsection (d);

ensuring, to the maximum extent practicable, that sufficient resources are available in each (6)

reviewing and coordinating the development of tools and techniques for enhancing the conduct of investigations and granting of clearances; and

(7) not later than 180 days after July 7, 2014 , and consistent with subsection (j)—

developing policies and procedures that permit, to the extent practicable, individuals alleging reprisal for having made a protected disclosure (provided the individual does not disclose classified information or other information contrary to law) to appeal any action affecting an employee’s access to classified information and to retain their government employment status while such challenge is pending; and

developing and implementing uniform and consistent policies and procedures to ensure proper protections during the process for denying, suspending, or revoking a security clearance or access to classified information following a protected disclosure, including the ability to appeal such a denial, suspension, or revocation, except that there shall be no appeal of an access determination for purposes of conducting an investigation, if that suspension lasts no longer than 1 year or the head of the (c) Performance of security clearance investigations

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 180 days after December 17, 2004 , the President shall, in consultation with the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b), select a single employees and contractor personnel of the United States Government who require access to classified information and to provide and maintain all security clearances of such employees and contractor personnel. The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) may designate other agencies to conduct such investigations if the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) considers it appropriate for national security and efficiency purposes.

take all necessary actions to carry out the requirements of this section, including entering into a memorandum of understanding with any December 17, 2004 ;

as soon as practicable, integrate reporting of security clearance applications, security clearance investigations, and determinations of eligibility for security clearances, with the database required by subsection (e); and

ensure that security clearance investigations are conducted in accordance with uniform standards and requirements established under subsection (b), including uniform security questionnaires and financial disclosure requirements.

(d) Reciprocity of security clearance and access determinations

All security clearance background investigations and determinations completed by an authorized investigative agency or authorized adjudicative agency shall be accepted by all agencies.

All security clearance background investigations initiated by an authorized investigative agency shall be transferable to any other authorized investigative agency.

An authorized investigative agency or authorized adjudicative agency may not establish additional investigative or adjudicative requirements (other than requirements for the conduct of a polygraph examination) that exceed requirements specified in Executive Orders establishing security requirements for access to classified information without the approval of the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b).

Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) may establish such additional requirements as the head of such entity considers necessary for national security purposes.

An authorized investigative agency or authorized adjudicative agency may not conduct an investigation for purposes of determining whether to grant a security clearance to an individual where a current investigation or clearance of equal level already exists or has been granted by another authorized adjudicative agency.

The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) may disallow the reciprocal recognition of an individual security clearance by an (6)

The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall establish a review procedure by which agencies can seek review of actions required under this section.

(e) Database on security clearances

Not later than 12 months after December 17, 2004 , the Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall, in cooperation with the heads of the entities selected pursuant to subsections (b) and (c), establish and commence operating and maintaining an integrated, secure, database into which appropriate data relevant to the granting, denial, or revocation of a security clearance or access pertaining to military, civilian, or government contractor personnel shall be entered from all authorized investigative and adjudicative agencies.

The database under this subsection shall function to integrate information from existing Federal clearance tracking systems from other authorized investigative and adjudicative agencies into a single consolidated database.

Each authorized investigative or adjudicative (4)

The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall evaluate the extent to which an authorized investigative agency or authorized adjudicative agency.

The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall evaluate the use of available information technology and databases to expedite investigative and adjudicative processes for all and to verify standard information submitted as part of an application for a security clearance.

(2) The evaluation shall assess the application of the technologies described in paragraph (1) for—

granting interim clearances to applicants at the secret, top secret, and special access program levels before the completion of the appropriate full investigation;

expediting investigations and adjudications of security clearances, including verification of information submitted by the applicant;

ongoing verification of suitability of personnel with security clearances in effect for continued access to classified information;

use of such technologies to augment periodic reinvestigations;

assessing the impact of the use of such technologies on the rights of applicants to verify, correct, or challenge information obtained through such technologies; and

such other purposes as the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) considers appropriate.

An individual subject to verification utilizing the technology described in paragraph (1) shall be notified of such verification, shall provide consent to such use, and shall have access to data being verified in order to correct errors or challenge information the individual believes is incorrect.

Not later than one year after December 17, 2004 , the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall submit to the President and the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the results of the evaluation, including recommendations on the use of technologies described in paragraph (1).

(g) Reduction in length of personnel security clearance process

The head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall, within 90 days of selection under that subsection, develop, in consultation with the appropriate committees of Congress and each authorized adjudicative agency, a plan to reduce the length of the personnel security clearance process.

(A) To the extent practical the plan under paragraph (1) shall require that each authorized adjudicative agency make a determination on at least 90 percent of all applications for a personnel security clearance within an average of 60 days after the date of receipt of the completed application for a security clearance by an authorized investigative agency. Such 60-day average period shall include—

a period of not longer than 40 days to complete the investigative phase of the clearance review; and a period of not longer than 20 days to complete the adjudicative phase of the clearance review. Determinations on clearances not made within 60 days shall be made without delay. The plan under paragraph (1) shall take effect 5 years after December 17, 2004 .

(B) During the period beginning on a date not later than 2 years after December 17, 2004 , and ending on the date on which the plan under paragraph (1) takes effect, each authorized adjudicative agency shall make a determination on at least 80 percent of all applications for a personnel security clearance pursuant to this section within an average of 120 days after the date of receipt of the application for a security clearance by an authorized investigative agency. Such 120-day average period shall include—

a period of not longer than 90 days to complete the investigative phase of the clearance review; and a period of not longer than 30 days to complete the adjudicative phase of the clearance review.

Not later than February 15, 2006 , and annually thereafter through 2011, the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the progress made during the preceding year toward meeting the requirements of this section.

(2) Each report shall include, for the period covered by such report—

the periods of time required by the authorized investigative agencies and authorized adjudicative agencies for conducting investigations, adjudicating cases, and granting clearances, from date of submission to ultimate disposition and notification to the subject and the subject’s employer;

a discussion of any impediments to the smooth and timely functioning of the requirements of this section; and

such other information or recommendations as the head of the entity selected pursuant to subsection (b) considers appropriate.

(i) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2005 and each fiscal year thereafter for the implementation, maintenance, and operation of the database required by subsection (e).

(j) Retaliatory revocation of security clearances and access determinations

(1) In general Agency personnel with authority to take, direct others to take, recommend, or approve personnel security clearance or access determinations shall not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take, any action with respect to anyaccess determination in retaliation for—

(A) any lawful disclosure of information to the Director of National Intelligence (or an employee designated by the Director of National Intelligence for such purpose) or a supervisor in the employee’s direct chain of command, or a supervisor of the employing agency with responsibility for the subject matter of the disclosure, up to and including the head of the employing agency (or (i)

a violation of any Federal law, rule, or regulation; or

mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;

(B) any lawful disclosure to the Inspector General of an employee designated by the head of theemployee reasonably believes evidences—

a violation of any Federal law, rule, or regulation; or

mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety;